Performance fees

-

It seems like you've provided a detailed description of various methods for calculating and allocating performance fees in hedge funds. These methods include the Partnership method, High Water Mark method, Equalization method, Equalization shares, Equalization account/depreciation deposit approach, and Multi-series.

Here's a brief summary of each method:

  1. Partnership Method: In this method, performance fees are allocated based on each investor's capital at the beginning of the period. It's simple and transparent but may result in investors incurring annual income taxes.

  2. High Water Mark Method: Performance fees are calculated at the fund level without considering individual investment performance. This method can be biased, especially for new investors, and may not accurately represent individual gains or losses.

  3. Equalization Method: This method aims to replicate the partnership method. It equalizes the price per share across different NAVs by issuing notional shares or taking a portion of money invested into a separate account. It ensures fair charging of incentive fees and avoids the "free ride" and "clawback" issues.

  4. Equalization Shares: Notional shares are issued when subscriptions are made, and they are adjusted based on the fund's performance. This method can be simple but may confuse investors as their holdings change monthly.

  5. Equalization Account/Depreciation Deposit Approach: This method issues equalization accounts when GAV is above the HWM and depreciation deposits when GAV is below HWM. It ensures that investors pay incentive fees on the increased value of their investments and avoids the "free ride" issue.

  6. Multi-Series: The fund comprises an initial series and subsequent subscriptions are allocated to new series. Each series reflects the fund's performance and avoids issues like "clawback" and "free ride." However, it can lead to complications if there are many series and may require reporting of all series.

It's important for hedge funds to choose a performance fee calculation and allocation method that aligns with their investment strategies and is transparent to investors. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages, so the choice may depend on the fund's specific circumstances and regulatory requirements.

Popular posts from this blog

Equalization accounting

-
Image
Equalization accounting Historically, hedge funds typically provide for some form of performance-based compensation to the investment manager of the hedge fund (as set out above under section 3).   This has generally been a percentage of the increase in the gross assets over the prior high water mark.  For example, if the prior performance fee period had a net asset value of 100 and the following period's net asset value was 120 then the further performance fee for the period will be paid on the amount of that increase which is 20 and the high water mark for this following period would be set at 120. Thereafter if the net asset value fell below 120, no performance fee would be payable.  Although relatively simple to understand, there were certain situations where individual shareholders would suffer a fee not in line with performance and, consequently, the investment manager would receive either too large or  too small a fee relative to the individual shareholder's perfor
Read more

PERFORMANCE FEE EQUALISATION

-
Image
When setting up a fund, one of the first decisions a manager has to make is the choice of fund structure. Partnership structures are very common in US domestic funds because they offer tax transparency to investors. Accounting calculations for partnership structures are relatively straightforward. Individual capital accounts are maintained for each partner and performance fees are calculated at the capital account level per partner. Therefore, there are no equalization issues for managers to contend with.   In Europe, a combination of other fund structures is frequently used which requires calculations of per share/unit price.   In calculating performance fees in these structures, the overriding concern among managers has been in determining how to fairly reward the manager for positive performance while at the same time ensuring investors are treated equitably. Essentially, this is where the various forms of performance fee Equalisation come in.   One of the most common
Read more

Equity Swap - Accounting

-
1. Learning Objectives Gain an understanding of the three primary components of equity swaps. Recognize distinctive features of equity swaps. Comprehend the motivations behind investors engaging in equity swap transactions. 2. Content An equity swap is an over-the-counter (OTC) derivative where two parties exchange cash flows. One cash flow mirrors the performance of a commonly traded stock, while the other represents interest. Cash changes hands solely at the contract's closure, either during a sale or a cover transaction, which is a characteristic shared with most derivatives. 2.1. Three Profit/Loss Components of an Equity Swap 2.1.1. Equity Leg This component reflects the performance of the underlying stock. 2.1.2. Interest Leg or Financing Leg This component signifies the interest payment the "long" side of the contract pays to the "short" side in return for benefiting from the stock's performance. Consequently, the "long" side is termed the &q
Read more