hedge fund performance fee calculations

-

It appears that you've provided a detailed explanation of various methods for calculating and handling performance fees in the context of investment funds. Let's break down the key points from your text:

Introduction to Performance Fees:

  • Hedge funds have expenses that can be shared among shareholders based on their investments and the period they are invested.
  • Fees can be either "assets-based" or "performance-based." Assets-based fees include custody, management, or administration fees, while performance fees are the focus of the discussion.
  • The challenge with performance fees is that their calculation and payment may not align with the fund's liquidity, potentially leading to unequal charges to individual shareholders.

The "Free Ride" Syndrome:

  • New shareholders entering the fund when the Net Asset Value (NAV) is below the high water mark (HWM) may not be charged incentive fees until the fund surpasses the HWM. This is referred to as the "free ride" issue.
  • The problem can be exacerbated when a significant amount of new subscriptions is accepted, potentially neglecting the investment manager.

The "Clawback" Syndrome:

  • The "clawback" phenomenon occurs when the fund appreciates in capital and incentive fees are provisioned but subsequently falls below its HWM. In this case, the provisioned fees are reversed and benefit all shareholders, including new investors.
  • This situation can be unfair because only those who were charged the fees initially should benefit.

Calculation Methods for Performance Fees:

  1. The Partnership Method:

    • Performance fees are allocated on a pro-rata basis for each investor's capital at the beginning of the period.
    • Provides a fair method for calculating carried interest but may result in investors incurring annual income taxes.

  2. High Water Mark (HWM) Method:

    • Treats all shareholders as a single pool and averages performance fees based on their investments.
    • May be biased toward new investors and not reflective of individual gains or losses.

  3. Equalization Method:

    • Aims to replicate the partnership method by equalizing the price per share across different NAVs.
    • Achieved through notional shares or equalization factors.
    • Ensures that investors pay fees only on the increased value of their investments, avoiding the "free ride" and "clawback" issues.
    • Fairly charges performance fees, and investors only pay taxes on realized gains.

  4. Multi-Series Method:

    • Involves issuing multiple series of shares with the same issuing price.
    • Performance fees are calculated based on the beginning capital of each series and the HWM.
    • Provides a fair distribution of carried interests among shareholders but can lead to complexities in reporting and administration.

Each method has its advantages and disadvantages, and the choice of which method to use may depend on factors such as the fund's volatility, tax implications, and reporting requirements. The goal is to find a method that fairly compensates fund managers while ensuring that investors are charged performance fees that align with their actual gains.

Popular posts from this blog

Equalization accounting

-
Image
Equalization accounting Historically, hedge funds typically provide for some form of performance-based compensation to the investment manager of the hedge fund (as set out above under section 3).   This has generally been a percentage of the increase in the gross assets over the prior high water mark.  For example, if the prior performance fee period had a net asset value of 100 and the following period's net asset value was 120 then the further performance fee for the period will be paid on the amount of that increase which is 20 and the high water mark for this following period would be set at 120. Thereafter if the net asset value fell below 120, no performance fee would be payable.  Although relatively simple to understand, there were certain situations where individual shareholders would suffer a fee not in line with performance and, consequently, the investment manager would receive either too large or  too small a fee relative to the individual shareholder's perfor
Read more

PERFORMANCE FEE EQUALISATION

-
Image
When setting up a fund, one of the first decisions a manager has to make is the choice of fund structure. Partnership structures are very common in US domestic funds because they offer tax transparency to investors. Accounting calculations for partnership structures are relatively straightforward. Individual capital accounts are maintained for each partner and performance fees are calculated at the capital account level per partner. Therefore, there are no equalization issues for managers to contend with.   In Europe, a combination of other fund structures is frequently used which requires calculations of per share/unit price.   In calculating performance fees in these structures, the overriding concern among managers has been in determining how to fairly reward the manager for positive performance while at the same time ensuring investors are treated equitably. Essentially, this is where the various forms of performance fee Equalisation come in.   One of the most common
Read more

Equity Swap - Accounting

-
1. Learning Objectives Gain an understanding of the three primary components of equity swaps. Recognize distinctive features of equity swaps. Comprehend the motivations behind investors engaging in equity swap transactions. 2. Content An equity swap is an over-the-counter (OTC) derivative where two parties exchange cash flows. One cash flow mirrors the performance of a commonly traded stock, while the other represents interest. Cash changes hands solely at the contract's closure, either during a sale or a cover transaction, which is a characteristic shared with most derivatives. 2.1. Three Profit/Loss Components of an Equity Swap 2.1.1. Equity Leg This component reflects the performance of the underlying stock. 2.1.2. Interest Leg or Financing Leg This component signifies the interest payment the "long" side of the contract pays to the "short" side in return for benefiting from the stock's performance. Consequently, the "long" side is termed the &q
Read more